Results:
Keyword: (Department OR Defense OR Handbook, OR 2017

Oct. 9, 2014

Policy Changes Needed at Defense Contract Management Agency to Ensure Forward Pricing RatesResult in Fair and Reasonable Contract Pricing

We reviewed Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) forward pricing rate policy and practice for indirect rates for compliance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and DoD policy. DCMA forward pricing rate policy covers the 353 contractor locations where DoD contracting officers use DCMA forward pricing rates to negotiate at least $70 billion in Government sales.

Sept. 30, 2014

Military Housing Inspections - Japan

Our objective was to inspect DoD military housing in Japan for compliance with DoD and Federal environmental health and safety policies and standards. Those policies and standards include the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes and standards, National Electrical Code (NEC), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards.

Sept. 29, 2014

Army Needs to Improve the Reliability of the Spare Parts Forecasts It Submits to the Defense Logistics Agency

We determined whether the Army is reasonably forecasting Special Program Requirements for spare parts ordered from the Defense Logistics Agency.

Sept. 17, 2014

Inappropriate Obligations for the T700 Technical, Engineering, and Logistical Services and Supplies Contract

We determined whether the Department of Defense effectively managed the T700 Technical, Engineering, and Logistical Services and Supplies contract. Specifically, we reviewed the obligation of funds for the T700 engine contract. This is the first report in a series of two reports on the T700 engine and addresses whether funds were obligated in accordance with United States Code and DoD regulations.

Sept. 17, 2014

Assurance Policy Evaluation Spacecraft and Strategic Systems

Our objective was to evaluate the sufficiency of Department of Defense (DoD) mission assurance policies and procedures used in the acquisition of spacecraft and strategic systems.

Sept. 12, 2014

Complaint Regarding the Use of Audit Results on a $1 Billion Missile Defense Agency Contract

We conducted this evaluation to determine the validity of a complaint alleging that Missile Defense Agency (MDA) negotiated a $1 billion contract without considering the audit results from Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA).

  • Office of Inspector General, United States Department of War, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500