Results:
Keyword: dod OR dmag

May 12, 2015

DoD Met Most Requirements of the Improper PaymentsElimination and Recovery Act in FY 2014, but Improper Payment Estimates Were Unreliable

We determined whether DoD complied with Public Law No. 107-300, “Improper Payments Information Act of 2002,” November 26, 2002, as amended by Public Law 111-204, “Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010,” July 22, 2010 (IPERA). The audit was required by Public Law 111-204.

May 8, 2015

Defense Logistics Agency Did Not Obtain Fair and Reasonable Prices From Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems for Sole-Source Commercial Spare Parts (Redacted)

Our objective was to determine whether the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) purchased sole-source commercial spare parts from Meggitt Aircraft Braking Systems (MABS) Corporation at fair and reasonable prices.

May 1, 2015

Navy Officials Did Not Consistently Comply With Requirements for Assessing Contractor Performance

The objective of the audit was to determine whether Navy officials completed comprehensive and timely contractor performance assessment reports (PARs). This is the first in a series of audits of DoD compliance with policies for evaluating contractor performance.

April 30, 2015

Quality Control Review of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and the DefenseContract Audit Agency FY 2013 Single Audit of The MITRE Corporation

As the cognizant Federal agency for the MITRE Corporation (MITRE), we performed a quality control review of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, (PwC) and Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) single audit report and supporting audit documentation for the audit period of October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013.

April 27, 2015

F-35 Engine Quality Assurance Inspection (Redacted)

We inspected the F-35 engine (F135) program’s quality management system for conformity to contractually required AS9100C, “Quality Management System,” statutory and regulatory requirements, DoD policies, and internal quality processes and p rocedures.

April 24, 2015

The Air Force's Information Technology Contracts Awarded Without Competition Were Generally Justified

Our objective was to determine whether the Air Force’s information technology (IT) contracts issued without competition were properly justified. This report is the third in a series of reports on DoD IT contracts awarded without competition. We nonstatistically reviewed 58 contracts.

April 23, 2015

Administration of Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Global Installation Multiple-Award Contracts Can Be Improved

Our objective was to determine whether Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) contracting officials provided a fair opportunity to compete, supported price reasonableness determinations, and performed surveillance for task orders issued under multiple-award contracts for services and in accordance with Federal and DoD procedures.

April 22, 2015

Project Announcement: Audit of Air Force Contractor Performance Assessment Reports for Nonsystems Contracts (Project No. D2015-D000CF-0177.000)

We plan to begin the subject audit in April 2015. Our objective is to determine whether Air Force officials completed comprehensive and timely contractor performance assessment reports for nonsystems contracts as required by Federal and DoD policies. This is report Air Force Officials Did Not Consistently Comply With Requirements for Assessing Contractor Performance DODIG-2016-043.

  • Office of Inspector General, United States Department of War, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500