Official websites use .mil
Secure .mil websites use HTTPS
April 30, 2015
Assessment of U.S. and Coalition Efforts to Develop the Sufficiency of Afghan NationalSecurity Forces' Policies, Processes, and Procedures for the Management andAccountability of Class III (Fuel) and V (Ammunition)
The overall objective of this project was to assess U.S. and Coalition efforts to develop the effectiveness of Afghan National Security Forces’ (ANSF’s) policies and procedures for the management and accountability of fuel (Class III [Bulk]) and conventional military ammunition and explosives (Class V).
Quality Control Review of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and the DefenseContract Audit Agency FY 2013 Single Audit of The MITRE Corporation
As the cognizant Federal agency for the MITRE Corporation (MITRE), we performed a quality control review of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, (PwC) and Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) single audit report and supporting audit documentation for the audit period of October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013.
Complaint Regarding the Award of a $576 Million Navy Contract Without Appropriate Consideration of Audit Findings
We conducted this evaluation to determine the validity of a complaint alleging that a Navy contracting officer awarded a $576 million contract without appropriately considering significant findings reported by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA).
U.S. Cyber Command and Military Services Need to Reassess Processes for fielding Cyber Mission Force Teams (Classified)
This report is no longer classified. To review the report see the FOIA reading room.
April 27, 2015
F-35 Engine Quality Assurance Inspection (Redacted)
We inspected the F-35 engine (F135) program’s quality management system for conformity to contractually required AS9100C, “Quality Management System,” statutory and regulatory requirements, DoD policies, and internal quality processes and p rocedures.
April 24, 2015
The Air Force's Information Technology Contracts Awarded Without Competition Were Generally Justified
Our objective was to determine whether the Air Force’s information technology (IT) contracts issued without competition were properly justified. This report is the third in a series of reports on DoD IT contracts awarded without competition. We nonstatistically reviewed 58 contracts.
Transmittal of the Disclaimer of Opinion on the United States Marine Corps FY 2014 Schedule of Budgetary Activity
April 23, 2015
Administration of Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Global Installation Multiple-Award Contracts Can Be Improved
Our objective was to determine whether Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) contracting officials provided a fair opportunity to compete, supported price reasonableness determinations, and performed surveillance for task orders issued under multiple-award contracts for services and in accordance with Federal and DoD procedures.
April 17, 2015
Challenges Exist for Asset Accountability and Maintenance and Sustainment of Vehicles Within the Afghan National Security Forces DODIG-2015-107
Our objective was to determine whether the Combined Security Transition Command–Afghanistan (CSTC–A) and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan’s Ministries of Defense and Interior have controls in place to effectively manage asset accountability for vehicles.
April 15, 2015
Independent Auditor's Report on Agreed-Upon Procedures for DoD Compliance With Service Contract Inventory Compilation and Certification Requirements for FY 2013
Our objective was to assess DoD’s compliance with Federal and DoD requirements when Components compiled and certified the FY 2013 inventory of contracts for services (ICS).