March 10, 2014

Shindand Pilot Training Contracts (For Official Use Only)

The report is For Official Use Only. To file a Freedom of Information Act request, please submit a request to FOIA Online.

March 6, 2014

Project Announcement: Follow-up Audit on DoD IG Report No. D-2007-108, “Outpatient Third Party Collection Program,” July 18, 2007

The objective of this audit is to determine whether Military Treatment Facility officials collected outpatient third-party health insurance claims, as agreed to in the recommendation included in Report No. D-2007-108. This is report Followup Audit: DoD Military Treatment Facilities Continue to Miss Opportunities to Collect on Third Party Outpatient Claims DODIG-2015-151.

March 4, 2014

Project Announcement: Audit of U.S. Air Force Sustainment of the F117 Engine from Pratt and Whitney

The objective of this audit is to determine whether U.S. Air Force officials are using cost-effective measures to sustain F117 engines. There are currently more than 1,000 F117 engines in inventory. This is report U.S. Air Force May Be Paying Too Much for F117 Engine Sustainment DODIG-2015-058.

Feb. 28, 2014

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Washington Properly Awarded Task Orders for Services

Our audit objective was to determine whether the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Washington properly awarded task orders under multiple award contracts for services. Specifically, we determined whether NAVFAC Washington contracting officials provided contractors a fair opportunity to compete, adequately supported determinations of price reasonableness in accordance with Federal and DoD policies, and used appropriate funding.

Feb. 12, 2014

Authorization of DoD Progress Payments For Ground Combat Vehicle Contracts Needs Improvement

We determined whether DoD officials authorized and administered progress payments in DoD contracts in accordance with selected Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and DoD policies. We examined progress payments for two contracts for the Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) Technology Development Phase.

Feb. 10, 2014

Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Could Not Identify Actual Cost of F119 Engine Spare Parts Purchased From Pratt and Whitney (For Official Use Only)

The report is For Official Use Only. To file a Freedom of Information Act request, please submit a request to FOIA Online.

Feb. 10, 2014

Systemic Physical and Cyber Security Weaknesses Within the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (For Official Use Only)

The report is For Official Use Only. To file a Freedom of Information Act request, please submit a request to FOIA Online.

Jan. 31, 2014

Followup Audit: Army Discontinued the Concept Next Generation Expanded Capacity Vehicle as Agreed

We conducted this followup audit to verify the agreed-upon actions for Recommendation B.1. of DoDIG Report No. D-2010-039. Our objective was to determine whether the Army discontinued the Next Generation Expanded Capacity Vehicle (ECV2) concept program and avoided spending about $3.84 billion as agreed to in Recommendation B.1. See Figure 1 for the ECV2 XM 1211 concept model.

Jan. 28, 2014

Followup Audit: Body Armor First Article Testing Standardized DoD-Wide

Our objective was to determine whether the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, coordinated with the Military Services, U.S. Special Operations Command, and Defense agencies to develop the standardized, first article testing procedures for body armor ballistic inserts as agreed to in Recommendation B of DoD IG Report No. D-2009-047, “DoD Testing Requirements for Body Armor,” dated January 29, 2009. Additionally, we determined whether the Military Services, U.S. Special Operations Command, and Defense agencies implemented the procedures to mitigate body armor testing inconsistencies.

Jan. 27, 2014

Defense Logistics Agency Effectively Managed Continental U.S. Mission-Critical Batteries

We determined whether the Defense Logistics Agency effectively fulfilled warfighter requirements for batteries designated mission-critical by military services. Specifically, we determined whether Defense Logistics Agency met the 4-day continental U.S. time definite delivery standard for fiscal year 2012 mission-critical battery requisitions. The DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Regulation notes that the time definite delivery concept represents 85 percent of the total time that the wholesale supply system is capable of delivering the required materiel to its customers.