Results:
Keyword: Defense OR Acquisition OR Guidebook, OR Section OR 10.5.2.2

Feb. 6, 2013

Assessment of the USAF Accident Investigation Board (AIB) Report on the F-22A Mishap of November 16, 2010

Our objective was to review the United States Air Force (USAF) Aircraft Accident Investigation Board (AIB) report on the F-22A mishap of November 16, 2010, for adherence to the procedures set forth in Air Force Instruction...

Feb. 5, 2013

Project Announcement: Audit of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Within the Department of Defense

The objective of this audit is to determine whether additional ERP systems cost increases and schedule delays have occurred since the July 2012 audit report was issued. This is report Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems’ Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations DODIG-2013-111.

Feb. 4, 2013

Project Announcement: Audit of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Supply Chain Management of Mission Critical Batteries

The objective of this audit is to determine whether the DLA is effectively fulfilling warfighter requirements for batteries designated mission-critical by military services. This is report Defense Logistics Agency Effectively Managed Continental U.S. Mission-Critical Batteries DODIG-2014-032.

Feb. 1, 2013

Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment Annual Report

The Department of Defense Inspector General issues the fourth annual report on Guam realignment. Public Law 111-84, Section 2835, "Interagency Coordination Group of Inspectors General for Guam Realignment," requires the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as the chairperson of the of the Interagency Coordination Group, to submit to the

Feb. 1, 2013

Project Announcement: Post Audit Review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) FY 2012 Working Capital Fund Financial Statements

The objective of this audit is to determine whether the procedures performed by an independent accounting firm for the audit of the DFAS FY 2012 Working Capital Fund financial statements were done in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards, as well as other criteria required to fulfill the contract requirements. This is report Independent Review of the DFAS FY 2012 Working Capital Fund Financial Statement Audit DODIG-2015-091.

Feb. 1, 2013

Project Announcement: Audit of Army Compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Revisions for the Use of Cost-Reimbursement Contracts

The objective of this audit is to determine whether the Army complied with interim Federal Acquisition Regulation revisions on the use of cost-reimbursable contracts. This audit is required by the FY 2009 National Defense Authorization Act. This is report Army Needs Better Processes to Justify and Manage Cost-Reimbursement Contracts DODIG-2013-120.

Jan. 31, 2013

Critical Information Needed to Determine the Cost and Availability of G222 Spare Parts (Redacted)

We evaluated two contracts, as well as acquisition planning and program documentation, to determine whether the cost and availability of G222 spare parts will allow for continued sustainability of the aircraft.

Jan. 24, 2013

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Ethics Program Met Federal Government Standards

Our audit objective was to determine whether DARPA ethics policies and program implementation were consistent with Federal Government conflict-of-interest mitigation standards and whether DARPA personnel were properly trained and following their policies.

Jan. 18, 2013

Contractor Compliance Varied With Classification of Lobbying Costs and Reporting of Lobbying Activities (Redacted)

What We Did We reviewed the financial records of 24 DoD contractors that were the recipients of 50 earmarks, valued at $115.5 million, to determine whether DoD contractors that lobbied for and were the recipients of earmarks complied with the requirements of the United States Code...

Jan. 15, 2013

Quality Controls for the Rotary Wing Transport Contracts Performed in Afghanistan Need Improvement

We determined whether United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) contracting officials had adequate controls over the contracts for transportation of supplies, mail, and passengers in Afghanistan.

  • Office of Inspector General, United States Department of War, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500