Official websites use .mil
Secure .mil websites use HTTPS
Nov. 9, 2015
Followup Audit: Navy Access Control Still Needs Improvement DODIG-2016-018
We determined whether the identified Navy installations implemented the agreed upon corrective actions for Recommendations A.1 and A.3 of DoDIG Report No. DODIG 2013-134, “Navy Commercial Access Control System Did Not Effectively Mitigate Access Control Risks.
Nov. 6, 2015
Independent Auditor's Report on the DoD Military Retirement Fund FY 2015 and FY 2014 Basic Financial Statements
This report is a result of Project No. D2015-D000FP-0126.000.
The Navy Needs to Improve the Management of Parts Required to Sustain the AN/SPY-1 Phased Array Radar System
Our objective was to evaluate whether the Navy cost effectively managed material requirements for the AN/SPY–1 Phased Array (SPY–1) radar systems.
Project Announcement: Attestation of the FY 2015 DoD Detailed Accounting Report for the Funds Obligated for National Drug Control Program Activities (Project No. D2016-D000FT-0042.000)
We plan to begin the subject review in November 2015. We will perform this review to meet the annual reporting requirements of the "Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998," Public Law 105-277, Title VII, October 21, 1998. This is report Independent Auditor's Report on the FY 2015 DoD Detailed Accounting Report for the Funds Obligated for National Drug Control Program Activities DODIG-2016-041.
Project Announcement: Attestation of the FY 2015 DoD Performance Summary Report of the Funds Obligated for National Drug Control Program Activities (Project No. D2016-D000FT-0043.000)
We plan to begin the subject review in November 2015. We will perform this review in accordance with "ONDCP Circular: Accounting of Drug Control Funding and Performance Summary," January 18, 2013. This is report Independent Auditor's Report on the FY 2015 DoD Performance Summary Report of the Funds Obligated for National Drug Control Program Activities DODIG-2016-042.
Project Announcement: Evaluation of Contracting Officer Actions on Defense Contract Audit Agency Incurred Cost Audit Reports (Project No. D2016-DAPOCF-0006.000)
We will begin the subject review in November 2015. The primary objective is to assess the appropriateness of Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) actions to resolve and complete the disposition of Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audits on DoD DoD contractor incurred costs. This is report Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Contracting Officer Actions on Defense Contract Audit Agency Incurred Cost Audit Reports DODIG-2017-055.
Independent Auditor's Report on the DoD Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund FY 2015 and FY 2014 Basic Financial Statements
This report should not be distributed without the accompanying financial statements on which it is based. To request a copy of the financial statements and report, please contact Robert J. Moss, Jr., Chief, Trust Fund and Revenue Cycle Management at the Defense Health Agency by phone at (703) 275-6267 or by email at robert.j.moss.civ@mail.mil.
Nov. 2, 2015
External Peer Review Report on the Defense Contract Management Agency Office of Independent Assessment Internal Review Team
This report is a result of Project No. D2015-DAPOIA-0189.000.
Oct. 29, 2015
Follow up on the Actions to Improve the Defense Contract Management Agency's Cost Analysis Function
We conducted this evaluation to follow up on the corrective actions taken by Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP), Defense Pricing (DP), and Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) in response to our previous Report No. DODIG-2013-015, “Actions to Align Defense Contract Management Agency and Defense Contract Audit Agency Functions,” November 13, 2012.
Oct. 28, 2015
Army Needs to Improve Contract Oversight for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program's Task Orders
ObjectiveOur objective was to determine whetherthe Army was providing sufficient contractoversight for Logistics Civil AugmentationProgram (LOGCAP) task orders issuedto support Operation United Assistance.Specifically, we determined whether the Armyappointed an adequate number of contractingofficer’s representatives (CORs); CORs wereappropriately