Jan. 3, 2018

Whistleblower Reprisal Investigation: Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment, Arlington, VA DODIG-2018-044

We conducted this investigation in response to allegations filed with the Department of Defense (DoD) Hotline by a sub-contractor who claimed that Leidos, Inc., non-selected the Complainant for inclusion on a bridge contract in reprisal for her making protected disclosures to company and Government officials.

Dec. 26, 2017

Project Announcement: Audit of the Military Sealift Command's Maintenance of Prepositioning Ships (Project No. D2018-D000JB-0068.000)

We plan to begin the subject audit in December 2017. Our objective is to determine whether the Military Sealift Command ensured that prepositioning ships received required maintenance. This is report Military Sealift Command’s Maintenance of Prepositioning Ships DODIG-2018-151 .

Dec. 26, 2017

U.S. Central and U.S. Africa Commands’ Oversight of Counternarcotics Activities DODIG-2018-059

We determined whether U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) effectively provided oversight of counternarcotics (CN) activities. A prior DoD OIG report, issued in September 2017, focused on the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for CN and Global Threats’ (ODASD CN&GT) oversight of CN activities. In our prior audit, we found that the ODASD CN&GT did not provide effective oversight of CN activities, to include tracking funding after the funds were transferred to the Combatant Commands (COCOM) for implementation. Subsequently, we conducted this audit to review the oversight of CN activities at USCENTCOM and USAFRICOM to provide a broader understanding of how the DoD executes its CN program.

Dec. 21, 2017

U.S. Military-Occupied Facilities Evaluation – Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar DODIG-2018-049

Our objective was to evaluate U.S. military‑occupied facilities at Al Udeid Air Base (AUAB) to verify compliance with DoD health and safety policies and standards regarding indoor air quality, electrical systems, fire protection systems, and active and inactive fuel systems.

Dec. 21, 2017

DoD Antiterrorism Programs DODIG-2018-046

The report is classified. To file a Freedom of Information Act request, please submit a request to FOIA Online.

Dec. 21, 2017

Enhanced End-Use Monitoring DODIG-2018-056

The report is classified. To file a Freedom of Information Act request, please submit a request to FOIA Online.

Dec. 21, 2017

The Financial Statement Compilation Adjustments and Information Technology Corrective Action Plan Validation Process DODIG-2018-057

Our audit objective was to determine whether adjustments made to the data during the FY 2017 financial statement compilation process were adequately documented and supported in accordance with the DoD Financial Management Regulation (FMR).

Dec. 20, 2017

Evaluation of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program Quality Management System DODIG-2018-045

We determined whether the DoD Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) prime contractors, United Launch Alliance (ULA) and Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX), and the ULA major subcontractor, Aerojet Rocketdyne (AR), performed adequate quality assurance management for the EELV program. Specifically, we evaluated EELV contractors’ compliance with the contractually required Aerospace Standard (AS) 9100C, “Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defense Organizations.”

Dec. 19, 2017

The National Security Agency Enterprise DODIG-2018-043

The report is classified.

Dec. 19, 2017

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Administration of Selected Energy Savings Performance Contracts DODIG-2018-050

We determined whether the Department of the Navy properly administered selected energy savings performance contracts (ESPCs) in accordance with Federal and DoD policies and procedures. This report is the fourth in a series on ESPCs in the DoD. Prior reports outlined that Navy (DODIG-2017-044) and Air Force (DODIG-2016-087 and DODIG-2015-138) contract personnel were not properly administering ESPCs. In addition, the Air Force did not have sufficient program management over its ESPC program.