HomeReportsAudits and Evaluations

May 9, 2017

The Army’s Corrective Actions Improved Cost Measures for Stryker Vehicle Contracts

We determined whether the Program Executive Office for Ground Combat Systems effectively implemented corrective actions related to Recommendations 1.c through 1.e in DoD OIG Report No. DODIG-2012-102, “Better Cost-Control Measures Are Needed on the Army’s Cost-Reimbursable Services Contract for Logistics Support of Stryker Vehicles,” June 18, 2012.

May 8, 2017

The DoD Did Not Comply With the Improper Payment Elimination and Recovery Act in FY 2016

Our objective was to determine whether the DoD complied with Public Law No. 107-300, “Improper Payments Information Act of 2002,” November 26, 2002, as amended by Public Law 111-204, “Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010” (IPERA), July 22, 2010, in its FY 2016 improper payment reporting.

May 4, 2017

Independent Auditor's Report on the Department of Defense FY 2016 Closing Package Financial Statements (Project No. D2016-D000FE-0212.000)

This report should not be distributed without the accompanying financial statements on which it is based. To request a copy of the financial statements and report, file a Freedom of Information Act request with the Office of the Secretary of Defense: http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/index.html.

May 4, 2017

Independent Auditor's Report on the Department of Defense FY 2016 and FY 2015 Basic Financial Statements

The report begins on page 143 of Section 3 of the United States Department of Defense Agency Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2016, which is hosted on the website of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller).

May 3, 2017

Independent Auditor’s Report on the Air Force General Fund FY 2016 and FY 2015 Basic Financial Statements

The report begins on page 108 of the FY 2016 United States Air Force Agency Financial Report.

May 3, 2017

Independent Auditor's Report on the Air Force Working Capital Fund FY 2016 and FY 2015 Basic Financial Statements

The report begins on page 159 of the Fiscal Year 2016 United States Air Force Agency Financial Report.

April 28, 2017

Army is Effectively Managing the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle, but There Are Concerns that Could Impact Program Cost, Schedule, and Performance

We determined whether the Army effectively managed the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle acquisition program. The Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle is replacing the Armored Personnel Carrier (M113) that entered service in 1960. According to the Army, the Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle will provide sufficient protection, mobility, and network-enabled functions to maneuver with and support combat vehicles throughout a range of military operations.