May 1, 2015

Navy Officials Did Not Consistently Comply With Requirements for Assessing Contractor Performance

The objective of the audit was to determine whether Navy officials completed comprehensive and timely contractor performance assessment reports (PARs). This is the first in a series of audits of DoD compliance with policies for evaluating contractor performance.

April 30, 2015

Assessment of U.S. and Coalition Efforts to Develop the Sufficiency of Afghan NationalSecurity Forces' Policies, Processes, and Procedures for the Management andAccountability of Class III (Fuel) and V (Ammunition)

The overall objective of this project was to assess U.S. and Coalition efforts to develop the effectiveness of Afghan National Security Forces’ (ANSF’s) policies and procedures for the management and accountability of fuel (Class III [Bulk]) and conventional military ammunition and explosives (Class V).

April 30, 2015

Quality Control Review of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and the DefenseContract Audit Agency FY 2013 Single Audit of The MITRE Corporation

As the cognizant Federal agency for the MITRE Corporation (MITRE), we performed a quality control review of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, (PwC) and Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) single audit report and supporting audit documentation for the audit period of October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013.

April 30, 2015

Complaint Regarding the Award of a $576 Million Navy Contract Without Appropriate Consideration of Audit Findings

We conducted this evaluation to determine the validity of a complaint alleging that a Navy contracting officer awarded a $576 million contract without appropriately considering significant findings reported by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA).

April 27, 2015

F-35 Engine Quality Assurance Inspection (Redacted)

We inspected the F-35 engine (F135) program’s quality management system for conformity to contractually required AS9100C, “Quality Management System,” statutory and regulatory requirements, DoD policies, and internal quality processes and p rocedures.

April 24, 2015

The Air Force's Information Technology Contracts Awarded Without Competition Were Generally Justified

Our objective was to determine whether the Air Force’s information technology (IT) contracts issued without competition were properly justified. This report is the third in a series of reports on DoD IT contracts awarded without competition. We nonstatistically reviewed 58 contracts.

April 23, 2015

Administration of Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Global Installation Multiple-Award Contracts Can Be Improved

Our objective was to determine whether Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) contracting officials provided a fair opportunity to compete, supported price reasonableness determinations, and performed surveillance for task orders issued under multiple-award contracts for services and in accordance with Federal and DoD procedures.

  • Office of Inspector General, United States Department of Defense, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500