Results:
Tag: Evaluation

Nov. 15, 2024

Evaluation of the Accountability of Presidential Drawdown Authority Defense Item Deliveries to Ukraine (Report No. DODIG-2025-037)

The objective of this evaluation was to determine whether the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) and the Military Services effectively and efficiently accounted for the delivery of Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) defense items provided to Ukraine in accordance with DoD property book and DSCA security assistance policy. In addition, we assessed whether the Security Assistance Group–Ukraine effectively and efficiently tracked and documented the transfer of PDA items to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Nov. 14, 2024

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office’s Artificial Intelligence Governance and Acquisition Process (Report No. DODIG-2025-039)

The objective of this evaluation was to assess the effectiveness of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office’s (CDAO) development of artificial intelligence (AI) strategy and policy for the DoD, and the CDAO’s acquisition and development of AI products and services. During the evaluation, we identified that, while the CDAO has been working on developing both AI strategy and policy, action is required to ensure effective governance going forward in this important area. Without these foundational elements in place, the DoD may not be able to achieve the full benefits of AI that are critical to its future success.

Nov. 12, 2024

Evaluation of Security and Accountability Controls for Defense Items Transferred to Ukraine Through Romania (Report No. DODIG-2025-019)

The objective of this evaluation was to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of the DoD’s security and accountability controls for DoD-procured defense items transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces through the logistics enabling node in Romania.

Nov. 8, 2024

Management Advisory: Concerns with the Navy’s Handling of Incidents Involving Aqueous Film-Forming Foam at Joint Base Pearl Harbor–Hickam (Report No. DODIG-2025-013)

This final management advisory identifies concerns found during the DoD Office of Inspector General’s evaluation of the DoD’s management of the operation, maintenance, safety, and oversight of the Navy’s Defense Fuel Support Point Joint Base Pearl Harbor–Hickam.

Nov. 8, 2024

Evaluation of DoD Actions Related to the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility’s Contamination of the Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam Community Water System (Report No. DODIG-2025-012)

The objective of the evaluation was to determine the extent to which DoD officials protected drinking water systems, in compliance with Federal and state regulations and DoD policy. We address the extent to which DoD officials managed the operation, maintenance, safety, and oversight of Defense Fuel Support Point Joint Base Pearl Harbor–Hickam, including the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, and protected the environment in Report No. DODIG 2025 011.

Nov. 8, 2024

Evaluation of the Operation, Maintenance, Safety, and Oversight of the Navy’s Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility (Report No. DODIG-2025-011)

The objective of the evaluation was to determine the extent to which DoD officials managed the operation, maintenance, safety, and oversight of Defense Fuel Support Point Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam, including the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, and protected the environment, in compliance with Federal and state regulations and DoD policy. We address the extent to which DoD officials protected drinking water systems, in compliance with Federal and state regulations and DoD policy in DODIG 2025 012.

Oct. 22, 2024

Evaluation of Medical Care Provided to Navy Sea, Air, and Land (SEAL) Candidates (Report No. DODIG-2025-008)

Consistent with the FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act, the objective of this evaluation was to conduct a comprehensive review of the health care provided to individuals undergoing Navy Sea, Air, and Land (SEAL) training to determine whether professionals providing health care to SEAL candidates are properly trained, quality assurance mechanisms with respect to this care are sufficient, and appropriate efforts to mitigate the health stress to individuals undergoing this training are in place.

Oct. 15, 2024

Follow-up Evaluation of Management Advisory: The Protection of Sensitive Mission Data by the Security Assistance Group-Ukraine and Its Subordinate Commands (Report No. DODIG-2025-006)

This report contains classified information and no redacted version is available. To file a Freedom of Information Act Request, please submit a request to FOIA.gov.

Sept. 30, 2024

Quality Control Review of the KPMG LLP FY 2023 Single Audit of Carnegie Mellon University (Report NO. DODIG-2024-142)

The objective of this quality control review was to assess whether KPMG LLP performed the FY 2023 single audit of Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon) in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards and Federal requirements for single audits.

Sept. 27, 2024

Management Advisory: The DoD Should Analyze the Use of Barcode Scanners for Conducting Inventories of Defense Articles Requiring Enhanced End Use Monitoring (Report No. DODIG-2024-140)

The DoD designed the Golden Sentry End Use Monitoring program to meet the intent of the Arms Export Control Act to ensure that foreign nations use U.S. defense articles in accordance with the terms and conditions of respective transfer agreements or other applicable agreements. The DoD designates certain defense articles as requiring enhanced end use monitoring, which includes physical security inspections of the facilities storing them, along with initial and annual serial number inventories of all defense articles.