Official websites use .mil
Secure .mil websites use HTTPS
Feb. 6, 2013
Assessment of the USAF Accident Investigation Board (AIB) Report on the F-22A Mishap of November 16, 2010
Our objective was to review the United States Air Force (USAF) Aircraft Accident Investigation Board (AIB) report on the F-22A mishap of November 16, 2010, for adherence to the procedures set forth in Air Force Instruction...
Feb. 5, 2013
Project Announcement: Audit of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Within the Department of Defense
The objective of this audit is to determine whether additional ERP systems cost increases and schedule delays have occurred since the July 2012 audit report was issued. This is report Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems’ Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations DODIG-2013-111.
Feb. 4, 2013
Project Announcement: Audit of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Supply Chain Management of Mission Critical Batteries
The objective of this audit is to determine whether the DLA is effectively fulfilling warfighter requirements for batteries designated mission-critical by military services. This is report Defense Logistics Agency Effectively Managed Continental U.S. Mission-Critical Batteries DODIG-2014-032.
Feb. 1, 2013
Project Announcement: Audit of Army Compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Revisions for the Use of Cost-Reimbursement Contracts
The objective of this audit is to determine whether the Army complied with interim Federal Acquisition Regulation revisions on the use of cost-reimbursable contracts. This audit is required by the FY 2009 National Defense Authorization Act. This is report Army Needs Better Processes to Justify and Manage Cost-Reimbursement Contracts DODIG-2013-120.
Project Announcement: Audit of Price Reasonableness Determinations for Datron World Communications, Inc. Contracts Awarded by the U.S. Army Contracting Command for the Afghan National Security Forces
The objective of this audit is to determine whether the U.S. Army Contracting Command obtained fair and reasonable prices for communications equipment and components procured from Datron World Communications, Inc. for the Afghan National Security Forces. This is report U.S. Army Contracting Command Did Not Obtain Fair and Reasonable Prices for Communications Equipment DODIG-2014-020.
Project Announcement: Post Audit Review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) FY 2012 Working Capital Fund Financial Statements
The objective of this audit is to determine whether the procedures performed by an independent accounting firm for the audit of the DFAS FY 2012 Working Capital Fund financial statements were done in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards, as well as other criteria required to fulfill the contract requirements. This is report Independent Review of the DFAS FY 2012 Working Capital Fund Financial Statement Audit DODIG-2015-091.
Project Announcement: Audit of Negotiated Rates for the TRICARE Overseas Program
The objective of this audit is to determine the extent to which TRICARE Management Activity, through the TRICARE Overseas Program contractor, is negotiating and adhering to reasonable rates for health care services provided in overseas locations. This is report DoD Did Not Negotiate Rates With Overseas Health Care Providers and Generally Paid Claims as Billed DODIG-2014-052.
Jan. 31, 2013
Independent Auditor's Report on the DoD FY 2012 Detailed Accounting Report of the Funds Obligated for National Drug Control Program Activities
Critical Information Needed to Determine the Cost and Availability of G222 Spare Parts (Redacted)
We evaluated two contracts, as well as acquisition planning and program documentation, to determine whether the cost and availability of G222 spare parts will allow for continued sustainability of the aircraft.
Jan. 24, 2013
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Ethics Program Met Federal Government Standards
Our audit objective was to determine whether DARPA ethics policies and program implementation were consistent with Federal Government conflict-of-interest mitigation standards and whether DARPA personnel were properly trained and following their policies.