Oct. 30, 2014

The Army Needs to Improve the Processes for Reporting Inventory Losses in Afghanistan (Redacted)

Our objective was to determine whether DoD effectively identified and reported inventory losses in Afghanistan. This audit focused on reporting inventory losses at the Redistribution Property Assistance Team (RPAT) yards in Afghanistan. This is one in a series of audits about the transfer of equipment from Afghanistan to the United States for reset and redistribution.

Oct. 29, 2014

Evaluation of the Defense Criminal Investigative Organizations' Defense Incident-Based Reporting System Reporting and Reporting Accuracy

We evaluated the Defense Criminal Investigative Organizations’ (DCIOs) process for reporting accurate criminal incident data to Defense Incident-Based Reporting System (DIBRS) in accordance with DoD Manual (DoDM) 7730.47-M, Volume 1, “Defense Incident-Based Reporting System (DIBRS): Data Segments and Elements,” December 7, 2010.1

Oct. 28, 2014

Defense Logistics Agency Did Not FullyImplement the Business Enterprise Architecture Procure-to-Pay Business Process in the Enterprise Business System

We determined whether the Enterprise Business System (EBS) Program Management Office implemented the DoD Business Enterprise Architecture (BEA) Procure-to-Pay business process to properly support the purchase of Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) goods and services and generate accurate and reliable financial management information.

Oct. 28, 2014

Military Housing Inspections - Republic of Korea

Our objective was to inspect DoD military housing in the Republic of Korea for compliance with DoD and Federal environmental health and safety policies and standards. Those policies and standards include the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) codes and standards, National Electrical Code (NEC), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards.

Oct. 23, 2014

Followup Audit: Enterprise BloodManagement System Not Ready forFull Deployment

Our objective was to determine whether the system configuration and early operational assessment for the Enterprise Blood Management System (EBMS) will meet the system requirements as agreed to in Recommendations A.4. and B.3 from DoD OIG Report No. D-2002-010, “Armed Services Blood Program Defense Blood Standard System,” and whether these corrective actions intended to mitigate the identified problems.

Oct. 17, 2014

Assessment of the Department of Defense Prisoner of War/Missing in Action Accounting Community

The objective was to assess the Department's programs and practices concerning the identification and repatriation of the remains of the Nation's missing in action (MIA) from past armed conflicts. This included the overall accounting community organization and effectiveness, issues raised about possible inappropriate official travel, and allegations made by past and present personnel assigned to the mission concerning poor leadership and mismanagement. In addition, we were asked to identify any other deficiencies related to the administration of programs carried out by the Defense Prisoner of War (POW)/Missing Personnel Office, Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC), and other members of the accounting community that have impeded or could impede its ability to accomplish the identification and repatriation mission.

Oct. 10, 2014

Assessment of DoD Long-term Intelligence Analysis (Classified)

The report is Classified. To file a Freedom of Information Act request, please submit a request to FOIA Online.

Oct. 9, 2014

Assessment of DoD-Provided Healthcare for Members of the United States Armed Forces Reserve Components

The objectives of this assessment were to determine whether DoD-provided healthcare programs support pre-deployment medical readiness rates and the efficient and effective post-deployment care of Reserve Component (RC) service members. We examined DoD-provided healthcare programs used to maintain or improve required medical readiness rates and also examined DoD-provided healthcare programs for wounded, ill, and injured members of the RC.

Oct. 9, 2014

Policy Changes Needed at Defense Contract Management Agency to Ensure Forward Pricing RatesResult in Fair and Reasonable Contract Pricing

We reviewed Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) forward pricing rate policy and practice for indirect rates for compliance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and DoD policy. DCMA forward pricing rate policy covers the 353 contractor locations where DoD contracting officers use DCMA forward pricing rates to negotiate at least $70 billion in Government sales.

  • Office of Inspector General, United States Department of Defense, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500