An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
A .mil website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
A lock (lock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

This reading room contains DoD OIG records released pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552 (FOIA) that are, or will likely become the subject of subsequent requests

Documents proactively released by the DoD OIG are located on the  “Reports” page at https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/

Press Releases, Multimedia, Testimony, Newsletters, and other items of provided by Public Affairs is located on the “News” page at https://www.dodig.mil/News/

FOIA Document | May 12, 2003

Acquisition of the Chemical Demilitarization Program

D-2003-088

Background

This report is the second in a series of reports that discuss the acquisition of the Chemical Demilitarization Program (the Demilitarization Program). The first report discussed the need for the Army to revise its acquisition program baseline agreement and to obtain a documented threat assessment for the Demilitarization Program. In May 2001, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (AT&L) designated the Demilitarization Program as a major Defense acquisition program and assigned the Army as the Executive Agent. The Office of the Secretary of Defense approved a life-cycle cost estimate of $24 billion for the Demilitarization Program in September 2001. Through December 2002, the Army awarded contracts totaling $5.8 billion for the construction, systemization, operations, and closure of seven chemical agent disposal facilities and planned two additional disposal facilities.

Results:

The Program Manager for the Demilitarization Program (the Program Manager) had made substantial progress in developing and operating chemical agent disposal facilities; however, program acquisition managers need to improve the program’s baseline performance by making better use of acquisition management policy and guidance in the areas of cost estimating, earned value management, preventive maintenance, failure reviews, and spare parts planning. Specifically:

  • The Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) needs to conduct program cost reviews to enable him to have up-to-date cost information needed to revise program cost baselines and funding requirements and for the Program Manager to more accurately report the estimated liability for disposal of chemical agents in DoD financial statements (finding A).

  • The facility project managers at Tooele, Utah; Anniston, Alabama; and Umatilla, Oregon need to correct cost and schedule information that is incomplete or inaccurate in contractor cost performance reports to enable them to effectively monitor and manage contract execution and the Program Manager to provide complete and accurate cost and schedule information in status reports to the Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) (finding B). The project manager at the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility needs to ensure that the contractor performs timely preventive maintenance to decrease equipment failures, avoid potential fines, eliminate safety hazards, and reduce facility operating costs (finding C).

  • The Program Manager needs to ensure that facility project managers conduct effective operational failure reviews to prevent schedule delays, reduce program costs, and avoid potentially life-threatening injuries to workers from exposure to nerve agent vapor (finding D).

  • The Program Manager needs to identify initial and replenishment spares early in facility development, assign national stock numbers to replenishment spares needed at multiple facilities, and establish an obsolescence program to identify replenishment spares to help resolve difficulties that facility project managers encounter when replenishing common spares (finding E).

In May 2002, the Office of the Director, Accounting Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer requested that the audit review the methodologies that the Program Manager used for computing the chemical stockpile inventory and life-cycle cost estimate for the Demilitarization Program. In response to that request, we determined that the methodologies used to develop the lifecycle estimate and compute the stockpile inventory were adequate. Appendixes E and F provide the details on the cost estimating and inventory methodologies. See Appendix A for the details of the review of the management controls relating to the above findings. The Findings section of the report provides detailed recommendations.

FOIA CONTACT

Department of Defense
Office of Inspector General

ATTN: FOIA Requester Service Center
4800 Mark Center Drive
Alexandria, VA  22350-1500

☎ 1+(866) 993-7005
☎ 1+(703) 604-9775
Fax: (571) 372-7498
foiarequests@dodig.mil 

 

DoD OIG FOIA Public Liaison

☎ 1+(703) 604-9785
FOIAPublicLiaison@dodig.mil

 

DoD OIG FOIA Appeals


ATTN: FOIA Appellate Authority
4800 Mark Center Drive
Alexandria, VA  22350-1500

☎ 1+(866) 993-7005
☎ 1+(703) 604-9775
Fax: (571) 372-7498
foiaappeals@dodig.mil

Office of Government
Information Services
National Archives and Records Administration

8601 Adelphi Road–OGIS
College Park, MD  20740-6001

☎ 1+(202) 741-5770
☎ 1+(877) 684-6448
✉  ogis@nara.gov
Website: https://www.archives.gov/ogis