Results:
Keyword: Defense OR Contract OR Management OR Agency OR contract OR modifications

April 25, 2014

Navy Can Improve Management of Zero-Demand Items

We determined whether the Navy, in coordination with the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), effectively identified and managed zero-demand stock.

April 15, 2014

DoD Efforts to Meet the Requirements of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act in FY 2013

We determined whether DoD complied with Public Law No. 107-300, “Improper Payments Information Act of 2002,” November 26, 2002, as amended by Public Law No. 111?204, “Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010,” July 22, 2010 (IPERA). The audit was required by Public Law 111-204.

April 14, 2014

Project Announcement: Audit of DoD Multiple-Award Contracts for Services at Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command

The objective of this audit is to determine whether contracting officials provided a fair opportunity to compete, supported price reasonableness determinations, and performed surveillance for task orders issued under multiple award contracts for services and in accordance with Federal and DoD procedures. This is report Administration of Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Global Installation Multiple-Award Contracts Can Be Improved DODIG-2015-109.

April 14, 2014

An Assessment of Contractor Personnel Security Clearance Processes in the Four Defense Intelligence Agencies

Our objective was to assess: a) how, or if, substantiated investigations of misconduct were reported to Agency Clearance Adjudication Facilities (CAF) and to the DoD Consolidated Adjudication Facility (DODCAF); b) if the referred investigations had been adjudicated; and c) the results of those security adjudications.

April 14, 2014

Defense Hotline Allegations Concerning the Fort Huachuca, Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground Contract Administration and Oversight Functions

Our objective was to review the adequacy of cost-control procedures and contract administration for cost-plus-award-fee contract W91RUS-10-C-0001 used at Fort Huachuca, Army Contracting Command–Aberdeen Proving Ground. In addition, the audit addresses three allegations concerning administration of the contract raised to the Defense Hotline.

April 14, 2014

Project Announcement: Assessment of Department of Defense Efforts to Build Counterterrorism and Stability Operations Capacity of Foreign Military Forces with “Section 1206” Funding

The objective of this assessment is to determine whether the DoD Global Train and Equip Program, stipulated by Public Law 109-163, Section 1206, as amended, is providing intended results and whether the coordination efforts between the Department of State Office of Inspector General is providing intended results.

April 11, 2014

Commercial Multimodal Cargo Procedures in Dubai Were Generally Effective, but Contract Oversight Could Be Improved

This is one in a series of reports regarding U.S. Transportation Command’s (USTRANSCOM’s) support of the Afghanistan drawdown. Our objective was to determine whether effective procedures were in place to process equipment at transfer locations in Southwest Asia. We evaluated whether the security, accountability, and timeliness of commercial multimodal procedures in Dubai were effective and whether controls were in place to provide oversight of the process.

April 9, 2014

Improvements to Controls Over Cash Are Needed at Army Disbursing Stations in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia

We determined whether the controls at the Army disbursing stations in Kuwait (Disbursing Station Symbol Numbers [DSSNs] 8550 and 8748) and Saudi Arabia (DSSN 5588) were adequate to safeguard, account for, document, and report cash held at those sites. In addition, we evaluated whether the U.S. Army Financial Management Command (USAFMCOM) effectively implemented technical oversight and provided assistance to the Army disbursing station in Saudi Arabia. The three disbursing stations we reviewed had $4.9 million in cash on hand at the time of our cash counts.

April 8, 2014

Army Financial Improvement Plans Generally Managed Effectively, but Better Contract Management Needed

Our objective was to determine whether the Department of the Army effectively managed its Financial Improvement Plan (FIP), including contractor support, to meet Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) goals. Specifically, we focused on the FIAR priorities of improving budgetary information and verifying the existence and completeness of mission critical assets. We also assessed the Army’s compliance with FIAR Guidance when developing 10 FIPs.