Results:
Category: Audit

Aug. 6, 2015

Marine Corps Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Program Management Met Acquisition Guidelines Intent, but Risks Remain

Our audit objective was to determine if the Marine Corps was effectively managing the Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) during the low-rate initial production (initial p roduction) phase. We evaluated the production plan for initial production units and planned developmental testing.

July 31, 2015

U.S. Forces Korea Service Components Can Improve Management of Individual Protective Equipment

Our objective was to determine whether forward deployed forces assigned to U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) are equipped to defend against chemical and biological (CB) agents. Specifically, the audit focused on equipment levels for U.S. forces stationed in the Republic of Korea (ROK). This is the first in a series of audits to address CB defense preparedness.

July 29, 2015

Special Operations Forces Support Activity Effectively Managed the Contractor Logistics Support Services Contract

We performed this audit to determine whether the Special Operations Forces Support Activity (SOFSA) was effectively managing the Contractor Logistics Support Services (CLSS) contract. Specifically, we determined whether the contractor was performing in accordance with contract terms and conditions and whether SOFSA was adequately monitoring the contractor’s performance.

July 29, 2015

Defense Information Systems Agency and Defense Logistics Agency Information Technology Contracts Awarded Without Competition Were Generally Justified

Our objective was to determine whether the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) information technology (IT) contracts issued without competition were properly justified. This report is the fourth in a series of audits on IT contracts issued without competition. We nonstatistically reviewed 55 contracts.

July 24, 2015

Followup Audit: DoD Military Treatment Facilities Continue to Miss Opportunities to Collect on Third Party Outpatient Claims

Our objective was to determine whether Military Treatment Facility (MTF) officials collected outpatient third party health insurance claims as agreed to in Recommendation 1.b of DoD IG Report No. D-2007-108, “Outpatient Third Party Collection Program,” July 18, 2007 and whether these actions corrected the identified deficiencies.

July 24, 2015

Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Generally Purchased Sole-Source Spare Parts From the General Electric Company at Fair and Reasonable Prices, but Improvements Could Be Made (Redacted)

Our audit objective was to determine whether the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Aviation was purchasing sole-source spare parts at fair and reasonable prices from the General Electric Company (GE).

July 17, 2015

Theater Blood Application Was Not Effectively Developed and Implemented DODIG-2015-150

Our objective was to determine whether management effectively developed and implemented the Theater Blood Application to meet the needs of the warfighter.

July 10, 2015

Followup Audit: AdditionalActions Needed to EffectivelyProvide Complete Audit Trailsfor Air Force Journal Vouchers

Our objective was to determine whether Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Columbus officials modified the journal vouchers (JV) for the Air Force General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources as agreed to in Recommendation B.1 of DoD IG Report No. DODIG-2012-027, “Deficiencies in Journal Vouchers That Affected the FY 2009 Air Force General Fund Statement of Budgetary Resources,” December 1, 2011 and whether these actions corrected the identified deficiencies.

  • Office of Inspector General, United States Department of Defense, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500