March 3, 2021

Evaluation of the U.S. Central Command's Response to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (DODIG-2021-058)

The objectives of this evaluation were to determine whether U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and its Component Commands executed a pandemic response plan (PRP); to identify the challenges encountered in implementing the PRP; and to identify the impact to operations resulting from COVID-19.

Jan. 27, 2021

Resolution of Investigation involving Lieutenant General (LTG) Michael T. Flynn, U.S. Army (Retired) (Case 20170321-043065-CASE-01)

We notified your office on April 11, 2017, that we initiated an investigation into an allegation that LTG Flynn failed to obtain required approval from the Department of the Army and the Department of State before receiving any emolument from a foreign government or a foreign government-controlled entity. During our investigation, our office also reviewed an allegation that LTG Flynn failed to submit his Termination Office of Government Ethics Form 278 (OGE Form 278), Public Disclosure Report, after he retired from the Army in 2014.

Nov. 5, 2020

Evaluation of the Army's Tactical Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) Payload Program (DODIG-2021-005)

Oct. 8, 2020

Evaluation of the U.S. European Command's Response to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (DODIG-2021-002)

On May 11, 2020, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG) began the subject evaluation to provide an early assessment of the efforts undertaken by U.S. Africa Command, U.S. Central Command, U.S. European Command (USEUCOM), U.S. lndo-Pacific Command, U.S. Southern Command, and the Joint Staff to maintain force, mission, and readiness while responding to the Coronavirus Disease-2019(COVID-19) pandemic and the subsequent public health crisis. This evaluation was conducted as a joint project by the Evaluations and Audit Components of the DoD OIG. This report focuses on the USEUCOM response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we will address the other Combatant Commands and the Joint Staff portions of this work separately.

Oct. 1, 2020

FOIA Case Log Fiscal Year FY 2020

DoD OIG FOIA Case Log for October 1, 2019 ‐ September 30, 2020.

Sept. 30, 2020

Evaluation of the U.S. Africa Command's Response to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (Report No. DODIG-2020-132)

On May 11, 2020, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG) began the subject evaluation to provide an early assessment of the efforts undertaken by U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM), U.S. Central Command, U.S. European Command, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, U.S. Southern Command, and the Joint Staff to maintain force, mission, and readiness while responding to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the subsequent public health crisis. This evaluation was conducted as a joint project bythe Evaluations and Audit Components of the DoD OIG. This report focuses on the USAFRICOM response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we will address the other Combatant Commands and the Joint Staff portions of this work separately.

Sept. 1, 2020

Audit of the Supply Chain Risk Management for the Navy's Nuclear Weapons Delivery System (DODIG-2020-122)

The objective of this audit was to determine whether the Navy implemented supply chain risk management (SCRM) for the sea-based Trident II Strategic Weapons System (SWS) in accordance with DoD requirements.

Aug. 21, 2020

Followup Evaluation of DODIG-2014-083, Insufficient Infrastructure Support to the Fixed Submarine Broadcast System (DODIG-2020-119)

Aug. 3, 2020

Evaluation of U.S. Air Force Air Refueling Support to the U.S. Strategic Command's Nuclear Deterrence Mission (DODIG-2020-110)

The objective of this evaluation was to determine whether the U.S. Air Force has mission capable aircraft and aircrew to meet the U.S. Strategic Command's (USSTRATCOM) Operation Global Citadel Operations Order (OPORD) air refueling requirements.

July 13, 2020

Report of Investigation: Mr. John H. James, Jr. Senior Executive Service Missile Defense Agency

On August 12, 2019, the DoD Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG) received a complaint referred from the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) containing allegations against Mr. John H. James, who at that time was MDA Executive Director. The complaint included allegations that Mr. James sexually harassed two employees whom we refer to as Employees 1 and 2. We also include Employee 3 who was a recipient of an inappropriate comment made by Mr. James in 2017.