Jan. 22, 2020

Evaluation of DoD Efforts to Counter Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (DODIG-2020-051)

The objective of this evaluation was to determine whether the counter small unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) Senior Integration Group (C-SIG) coordinated and integrated the Military Services' and other DoD Components' efforts to meet evolving C-UAS needs.

Dec. 30, 2019

Evaluation of Military Service Capacity to Fill Combatant Command Requests for Counterintelligence Support (DODIG-2020-045)

Dec. 18, 2019

FOIA Case Log Fiscal Year FY 2019

Dec. 13, 2019

Audit of Combatant Commands Integration of Space Operations Into Military Deception Plans (DODIG-2020-039)

We recommend that the joint Staff Director of J39 document the relationship between MILDEC and space operations.

Oct. 1, 2019

FY2020 Lead IG COP-OCO Classified Appendix (Redacted)

Aug. 13, 2019

Evaluation of USAFRICOM's and SOCAFRICA's Processes for Determining and Fulfilling Intelligence Requirements for Counterterrorism (DODIG-2019-111)

The objective of this evaluation was to determine whether U.S. Africa Command (USAFRICOM) and Special Operations Command Africa (SOCAFRICA) followed established DoD guidance for identifying and prioritizing intelligence requirements and whether SOCAFRICA was capable of satisfying USAFRICOM's priority intelligence requirements (PIRs) for counterterroism.

June 24, 2019

Audit of the Distribution of Preferred Munitions in Support of the Republic of Korea (DODIG-2019-099)

June 24, 2019

Follow-up Evaluation of Corrective Actions Taken in Response to a Prior DoD OIG Audit of the F-35 Lightning II Autonomic Logistics Information System (DODIG-2019-100)

April 19, 2019

Audit of the B61-12 Tail Kit Assembly Program (DODIG-2019-080)

We determined whether the Air Force was developing the B61-12 tail kit assembly within cost, schedule, and performance requirements. We focused this audit on whether the Air Force met the baselines for cost, schedule, and performance, which are discussed below.

April 15, 2019

Evaluation of Intelligence Interrogations Requiring Special Approval (Report No. DODIG-2019-077)

We determined whether the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence's, the U.S. Southern Command's, the U.S. Central Command's, and the U.S. Special Operations Command's oversight of intelligence interrogation approaches and techniques adhered to applicable DoD policies and regulations. We did not focus on the Defense Intelligence Agency's role because the Defense Intelligence Agency's responsibility for intelligence interrogations was providing oversight of counterintelligence and human intelligence (Cl/HUM INT) training, not overseeing the performance of combatant command Intelligence interrogations.